them
to prefer females as romantic partners. Because the expression of same-sex
erotic attraction appears to be independent of traits governing the expression
of culturally induced images of femininity and masculinity, the mechanism
linking hormone imbalance to same sex preference appears extremely weak.
One
version of the hormone transfer hypothesis focuses on the .masculinization. of
females and predicts increased levels of same-sex attraction among female, but
not male opposite-sex twins.
We
test this hypothesis and find no support for it. A less restrictive version,
which allows for a .feminization. of males, appears at first glance to be
inseparable from the socialization hypothesis. This is not the case. In this
article, we design a test to isolate the socialization effect.
Specifically,
we consider same-sex romantic attraction for OS twins with an older same-sex
sibling. The socialization hypothesis suggests that if a same-sex older sibling
is present in the household, parents and other socialization agents would have
already established scripts for gendered upbringing (Huston 1983). These
scripts provide models for interaction with the twin of the same sex. The
hormone transfer hypothesis is falsified if we show that OS twins with an older
same-sex sibling do not report
same-sex preferences that are different from the other sibling pairs, since the
effects of hormone transfers should be insensitive to birth-order. This is the
case in our data. Table 1 summarizes the predictions arising from the models
reported above.
Table
1: Social Influence, Genetic
Influence, Hormone Transfer, and Evolutionary Dynamics Predictions for
Adolescent Same-Sex Romantic Attraction.
|
|
Social influence model |
Genetic influence model |
Hormone transfer model |
Evolutionary dynamics model |
|
OS
twins are more likely to express same-sex attraction than
others |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
|
OS
twins with older SS siblings are not more likely than others
to express same-sex attraction |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
|
Likelihood
of same-sex attraction increases with number of older
brothers for males |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
|
Concordance
of same-sex attraction among sibling pairs increases
with genetic similarity is higher than DZ twins or full-siblings |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
Data and Design
Data
for this study were drawn from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent
Health, a nationally representative, school-based study of adolescents in the 7th
.12th grades. Data from
the first wave, a self-administered in-school survey conducted in 1994-1995,
were used to generate a nationally representative core sample of students and
several special samples for a second and third wave of interviewing. A genetic
sample of twins and siblings living in the same household was drawn from the
90,118 respondents of the first in-school survey. The genetic sample comprises
5512 persons making up 3139 pairs of siblings. Both siblings in each pair were
interviewed in a second, in-home survey. The genetic sample consists of 289
pairs of MZ twins,
495
pairs of DZ twins, 1251 pairs of full siblings, 442 pairs of half siblings, and
662 pairs of nonrelated siblings. The majority of same-sex twins were
determined to be MZ or DZ based on their self-reported confusability of
appearance (averaged over both twins. self-report). When selfreport data on
appearance was missing, MZ or DZ classification was made from the mother.s
report of confusability of appearance, or on the basis of molecular genetic
markers12.
Including
the special samples, 20,745 adolescents were interviewed in the second wave in
1994- 95, which solicited information on socio-economic background, demographic
variables, health status and health risk behavior, self-esteem and depression,
sexual activity, romantic relationships and friendships, as well as academics,
expectations for the future, and employment. Over 79% of eligible respondents
completed the follow-up second wave interviews. With the exception of seniors,
all respondents were eligible for a follow-up survey in 1996, resulting in
14,738 interviews. The response rate for the third wave was over 80%.
_______________________________________________
12
For details on the design of the National Longitudinal Study for
Adolescent Health, see P.S. Bearman, J. Jones, J.R. Udry. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health:
Research Design. URL:
http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth
Strana 8
For
the present study, same-sex romantic attraction was based on the question:
.Have you ever had a romantic attraction to a female (male)?. Both in-home
surveys used ACASI technology (Audio computer-assisted self-administered
interviewing) for sensitive questions about sexual and non-normative behavior,
including the question about same-sex romantic attraction. ACASI technology has
been shown to yield more accurate responses to sensitive questions than
standard interview technique (Turner et al. 1998). The proportion of
adolescents reporting a same-sex relationship or homosexual activity is small
in this sample (3.4 % and 0.84 % respectively).
Consequently,
we focus on same-sex romantic attraction.13
Results
Table
2 reports the proportion of adolescents reporting same-sex attraction, by
gender and sibling classification. Overall, 8.6 % of the full sample reported a
same-sex romantic attraction in the first and/or second in-home survey, 7.8 %
for female adolescents and 9.4 % for males (N=20,729; 26 respondents had
missing data on both waves). We first consider support for the social influence
model that hypothesizes that opposite-sex twins should be subject to a
different socialization regime than same-sex twins or opposite-sex full
siblings. To allow for unambiguous classification, rows 1-7 exclude respondents
who contribute more than one pair to the genetic sample (94 % of persons in the
genetic sample are part of only one pair). Row 9 reports prevalence for a
comparable group in the non-genetic sample, and row 8 for the entire nongenetic
sample. The genetic and non-genetic samples are not significantly different
from each other with respect to prevalence of same-sex attraction.
|
Table 2: Same-sex romantic attraction by sibling
classification and gender |
|||||
|
|
|
Female |
Male |
||
|
|
|
N |
% with attraction |
N |
% with attraction |
|
Genetic sample |
|||||
|
1 |
Opposite-sex
twin |
190 |
5.3 |
185 |
16.8 |
|
2 |
Same-sex
twin, dizygotic |
259 |
6.6 |
276 |
9.8 |
|
3 |
Same-sex
twin, monozygotic |
264 |
7.6 |
262 |
9.9 |
|
4 |
Opposite-sex
full sibling |
423 |
8.3 |
427 |
7.3 |
|
5 |
Same-sex
full sibling |
601 |
7.5 |
596 |
7.9 |
|
6 |
Other
(non-related, half sibling) |
855 |
9.6 |
832 |
10.6 |
|
7 |
Together |
2592 |
8.1 |
2578 |
9.7 |
|
|
χ2 |
5.9 (df=5) (P=0.320) |
16.4 (df=5) (P=0.006) |
||
|
Non-genetic sample |
|||||
|
8 |
All |
7277 |
7.8 |
6954 |
9.4 |
|
9 |
Respondents
with one sibling |
2848 |
6.7 |
2954 |
9.0 |
|
Combined |
|||||
|
10 |
Total |
10480 |
7.8 |
10249 |
9.4 |
Strana 9
